First, let me say that I never believed in the Bin Laden Tapes; never. The Establishment fingered Bin Laden as the 9/11 perpetrator and has since murdered millions of Arab people in their search for Bin Laden, without retaliation from Al Qaida and without finding Bin Ladin. Are we to believe that Bin Laden had there wherewithall to orchestrate an attack on American soil but cannot find the gumpsion to retaliate? With our open borders, and its proliferation of drugs and illegals, we are to believe there are no Bin Laden sympathizers on this soil willing to orchestrate any suicide attempts or car bombings. The Establishment views us as children. Their tactics at trying to sway our opinion are elementary to say the least. What the Establishment doesn’t understand about “conspiracy theorists” is that we ask ourselves, “What would we do?” Whether it’s viewing a situation from the eyes of the antagonist or protagonist, various scenarios are played out. Most of these scenarios are based on past historical actions. Governments and so-called insurgents never seem to change their stripes. They’ve been doing the same things and reacting the same ways since time immemorial. So when I see this report on the most Bin Laden offering and I have to ask myself, “Why the hell would he do that?”
"The events of Manhattan were retaliation against the American-Israeli alliance's aggression against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, and I am the only one responsible for it. The Afghan people and government knew nothing about it. America knows that," the al-Qaida leader said.
For years conspiracy theorists have insisted that none of the Bin Laden tapes contained an actual admission and this was in part cause for dissent by many Americans. Why would Bin Laden put the kibosh to an atmosphere that serves him? Why would he do that? Secondly, if the last attack was spurned by the “American-Israeli alliance,” you’d think that the “hope” birthed by the recent Rose Garden performance would be met with more than a lame assed public announcement.
"As the FBI has said since 9/11, bin Laden was responsible for the attack, "Kolko said in a statement. "In this latest tape, he again acknowledged his responsibility. This should help to clarify for all the conspiracy theorists, again — the 9/11 attack was done by bin Laden and al-Qaida."
Again, why would he do that? After seven years? How would it benefit Bin Laden to finally make an admission to something everyone already knows? We already know that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Hell, we know that Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 but the Establishment got a pass because they said they were searching for Bin Laden in its mountains. The Establishment would sooner benefit from an admission such as this. As stated above by the FBI, an admission would debunk any conspiracy theories; right.
It’s funny that the FBI would stand so firm in their insistence that Bin Laden committed 9/11. Osama Bin Ladin was never “Wanted” by the FBI for the atrocities of 9/11. Why, I don’t know, maybe it’s because they had no proof. Why would he confess to a crime he was never officially charged with? It lists Bin Laden’s crimes, there is no mention of 9/11. I guess an updated page will be posted in the next few days.
It’s funny that the FBI would stand so firm in their insistence that Bin Laden committed 9/11. Osama Bin Ladin was never “Wanted” by the FBI for the atrocities of 9/11. Why, I don’t know, maybe it’s because they had no proof. Why would he confess to a crime he was never officially charged with? It lists Bin Laden’s crimes, there is no mention of 9/11. I guess an updated page will be posted in the next few days.
On the FBI Most Wanted Page for Osama:
Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
That's it. There is nothing about 9/11. I mean hey, "throughout the world" is pretty vague.
"It is better for you to stand against your leaders who are dropping in on the White House, and to work seriously to lift the injustice against the believers," he said, accusing U.S. forces and their allies of intentionally killing women and children in Afghanistan.
What allies? Who’s still down with this venture? Bulgaria and Ukraine were out of there December 2005. Britain planned to pull out 3,000 in May. Italy broke out September 2005. Japan and Korea are still hanging in there, although, Japan and Korea are there for manual labor towards reconstruction. We cannot omit the fact that two of the trongest allies of the U.S., Australia and Poland, just announced that they are jumping ship in 2008. What’s left of the 27 nation coalition, mechanics, sentries and brick layers? Ayuh, I think so! This isn’t new news. Bin Laden doesn't have a fact checker? There seems are more Arabs fighting Iraqi insurgents than Europeans. With the mass exodus of “allies” within the last two years and a new American leader just over the horizon, you’d think he’d be more aware that the Establishment's hold on this war is coming to a close. Ultimately, with the U.S. already standing alone in its persistence to remain in Iraq, WHY WOULD HE call for the Europeans’ departure when that cause has already been met?
Why would he do that?
Disclaimer: I’m an American and Patriot! I love my country and support my government completely. I hate Bin Ladin, I support the troops and wish for their safe journey home. Amen.
